The judgment stays, even when the expert goes.
PLM records what was done. Continuity captures why — the tradeoffs, the rejected alternatives, the lessons paid for in test campaigns — and binds it to the exact artifacts, so the next team inherits reasoning, not folders.
Most critical engineering knowledge is never written down.
It lives in the heads of senior engineers — and it leaves with them. Two-week handovers transfer file locations, not judgment. The next program re-learns the same lessons in the same expensive test campaigns.
A new team proposes deleting a sensor to cut cost. Continuity surfaces that the exact simplification was tried two platforms ago — and failed cold-weather validation. The rejected revision, the sim run, and the test campaign are one click away. The mistake is caught in design review, not in the field.
Capture without homework. Handoff without gaps.
Decision detection
The harness watches revisions, calibrations, and test outcomes for consequential, undocumented changes — and flags them for capture while the author is still around.
Grounded interviews
Instead of "write down everything you know," the expert gets one sharp question at a time, built from what's already in the system. Answer by voice or text.
Artifact-bound rationale
Captured explanations are transcribed and linked inline to the exact test reports, sim runs, and revisions they reference. No orphan notes.
Knowledge playbook
A living handoff document — architecture, decisions with sources, open risks — regenerated as the project changes, exportable for review.
Onboarding journeys
New engineers get a narrated tour, a decision timeline, and an ask-anything copilot over the project's full history. Months of context in days.
Knowledge map
Coverage, ownership, and single-points-of-failure across topics — so you see which expertise is at risk before the resignation letter arrives.
Detect. Capture. Bind. Hand forward.
Detect the consequential
Continuity monitors connected systems for decisions that changed outcomes — a control strategy rewritten days after a failed test, a tolerance quietly widened — and ranks what's undocumented.
Capture the why
The expert answers grounded questions in minutes, not workshops. Voice or text; the harness does the structuring.
Bind to evidence
Every claim in the captured rationale is linked to its artifacts. Click any statement, land on the source. Nothing generated-but-unverifiable.
Hand forward
Successors get the playbook, the onboarding journey, and a copilot that answers "why is it built this way?" with citations — long after the author has left.
Continuity questions.
01How much of the expert's time does capture take?+
02What if the expert has already left?+
03Is this just for retirements?+
Whose knowledge walks out next year?
A 30-minute walkthrough of Continuity on a scenario from your own domain.